01
Recruitment Committee Pack

Natan

Betis | defender | es La Liga

  • Natan is a 23-year-old defender for Betis in es La Liga. This view is based on 2,175 sample minutes from 2024-25 players · 2025-26 Elo.
  • The evidence points to a shortlist priority case. SquadLens's overall view is 78/100 (high). Treat this as a football discussion first, then check price, medical and live scouting.
  • What he looks like: Natan reads primarily as an aerial threat, with duel efficiency the strongest supporting evidence. His clearest strength is duel efficiency. He wins tackle attempts at a strong rate. In this sample, he sits in the top 10% of defender peers.
  • The main question for the room is whether the player fits the exact job we need. Before any bid, watch the clips and confirm the role fit.
78/100
Shortlist priorityKeep in the live shortlist and compare against alternatives in the same role.
Commercial (Our Squad)
ContractJun 2029 (~3.1 yrs remaining)
Wage (est.)€2,800,000
Asking fee (est.)€15,000,000

Demo estimate only; left-footed centre-back profile, fee band requires finance validation.

02
Slide 02

Financial Briefing

Commercial gates before statistical evidence

  • Contract pressure: Jun 2029 (~3.1 yrs remaining).
  • Confirm maximum valuation against the asking fee marker (€15,000,000) before any club or agent contact.
  • Confirm the approved wage band against the wage estimate (€2,800,000) and the current squad structure.
  • Maintain budget discipline: treat the case as price-dependent until Finance confirms fee, wage, taxes, agent fees and add-ons.
  • The statistical evidence that follows is recruitment decision support only, not valuation advice.
  • Commercial notes: Demo estimate only; left-footed centre-back profile, fee band requires finance validation.
Commercial gateFinance sign-off before evidence
Contract untilJun 2029 (~3.1 yrs remaining)
Wage estimate€2,800,000
Asking fee estimate€15,000,000
NotesDemo estimate only; left-footed centre-back profile, fee band requires finance validation.

Stats support recruitment prioritisation; they are not a valuation model.

03
Slide 03

Scorecard

What the rating means for the recruitment room

  • At 78/100, Natan reads as a high-level defender target: the numbers say he should stay in the live shortlist, then video, medical and price decide whether the club should move.
  • Squad-role projection: profiles as a rotation / squad-depth option at defender, best judged against the exact minutes gap and price.
  • This view is built on 2,175 sample minutes from 2024-25 players · 2025-26 Elo, with sample confidence at 100/100.
  • Committee implication: keep him in the room, compare him against alternatives, and decide what price makes the case attractive.
  • Natan reads primarily as an aerial threat, with duel efficiency the strongest supporting evidence. SquadLens rating: 78/100 (high). Style labels: Aerial threat (79), Ball-winning defender (72). Closest statistical mirrors: Matteo Gabbia (~88% similarity), Dylan Batubinsika (~88% similarity), Raúl Asencio (~88% similarity).
78high
Committee readShortlist priority

At 78/100, Natan reads as a high-level defender target: the numbers say he should stay in the live shortlist, then video, medical and price decide whether the club should move.

Squad-role projection: profiles as a rotation / squad-depth option at defender, best judged against the exact minutes gap and price.

PerformanceUpsideSampleDurability
PerformanceHow strong the current football output looks.
75
UpsideHow much runway the profile still has.
92
SampleHow much trust to put in the minutes base.
100
DurabilityDurability / availability confidence in the current data.
50
Duel efficiency94elite percentile
Aerial security85strong percentile
Reading passing lanes80strong percentile
Passing distance gained77strong percentile
04
Slide 04

Style & Role Fit

How the player creates value in the target role

  • Aerial threat scores 79/100 and indicates that dominates high balls and converts aerial presence into repeatable value.
  • Ball-winning defender scores 72/100 and indicates that breaks up attacks with tackles, interceptions and defensive actions.
  • Profile as a centre back within a 4-3-3 or possession-led recruitment model.
  • Fits analysis for build-up security, duel dominance, and box-defending responsibility.
  • Weaknesses focus on defensive and progression duties, not attacking output.
Aerial threat79/100 · good

Dominates high balls and converts aerial presence into repeatable value.

Won: 91st percentile · Won%: 85th percentile
Ball-winning defender72/100 · good

Breaks up attacks with tackles, interceptions and defensive actions.

Clr: 85th percentile · Int: 80th percentile
05
Slide 05

Evidence To Buy

Role-relevant strengths

  • Duel efficiency grades in the 94th percentile for Tkl%, giving the committee a clear role-relevant buying signal.
  • Aerial security grades in the 85th percentile for Won%, giving the committee a clear role-relevant buying signal.
  • Reading passing lanes grades in the 80th percentile for Int, giving the committee a clear role-relevant buying signal.
  • Passing distance gained grades in the 77th percentile for PrgDist, giving the committee a clear role-relevant buying signal.
xGbelow
40
npxGbelow
40
Astaverage
71
Prog passesaverage
55
Prog carriesaverage
52
Tkl+Intaverage
71
Reading passing lanesstrong
80
06
Slide 06

Risks & Due Diligence

Questions before green-lighting a bid

  • No injury-history fields in this dataset; durability held neutral.
  • Weaknesses are intentionally role-relevant; irrelevant metrics are excluded from the development watchlist.
  • SquadLens rating: 78/100 (high) from role-specific DNE percentiles, age, minutes reliability and injury-history fields where available.
  • No injury-history fields in this dataset; durability held neutral.
  • Decision-support output only: validate with video, live scouting, medical, financial and character due diligence.

No material role-specific risks surfaced by the current model.

07
Slide 07

Comparable Profiles

Nearest statistical style matches

  • Matteo Gabbia at Milan is the closest stylistic reference in the sample at 88.3% similarity.
  • Dylan Batubinsika at Saint-Étienne is the closest stylistic reference in the sample at 88.3% similarity.
  • Raúl Asencio at Real Madrid is the closest stylistic reference in the sample at 88.1% similarity.
Matteo GabbiaMilan · DF
88.3%
Dylan BatubinsikaSaint-Étienne · DF
88.3%
Raúl AsencioReal Madrid · DF
88.1%
08
Slide 08

Committee Decision

Next actions

  • Agree max valuation and wage band before any agent or club contact.
  • Run a focused video review against the listed risks and tactical-fit notes.
  • Benchmark the player against internal squad gaps and alternative targets in the same role.
  • If the price clears the internal threshold, move to live scouting and medical due diligence.
  • Decision-support output only: validate with video, live scouting, medical, financial and character due diligence.
Shortlist priority78/100
SquadLens signing committee deck | 2024-25 players · 2025-26 Elo · build c24bfa9ab4 · schema 1 · matches: football-data · 2025-2026 | players: bundled · 2024-2025 · as of 2026-05-10T23:44:43.585135+00:00 | Decision-support output only: validate with video, live scouting, medical, financial and character due diligence.